L.A. Homeboy: Gary Baseman on Creating his Alter Ego, Ditching Art School, and Why He Hates "Pop Surrealism"




The artist’s first retrospective hits the Skirball on April 25
Gary Baseman started his creative life as an illustrator but he soon wandered farther afield, expanding his distinctive style into paintings, giant inflatable toys, an Emmy-winning cartoon, and even a board game (play any Cranium lately?). It all goes on display this month at the Skirball in The Door Is Always Open, a homey installation where Baseman invites visitors to get comfy and get creative. We spoke with him about how his family and his neighborhood influenced his art.

Where did the name of this retrospective come from?
My father with his strong Yiddish accent would repeat things to me over and over. One of them was “The door is always open.” He would always tell me no matter where I was in my life, or where I was traveling, or how I was doing, that his home was always my home. He died almost three years ago. I put that phrase on his headstone. The irony is, with my mom just passing, now is the first time that their actual home is no more. I want the audience coming in to know the creative door is always open, and that the only thing that’s keeping it from opening is their own insecurities, their own fears.

You’re an L.A. native, born and raised in the Fairfax District. What was it like growing up?
My mom and dad lived here for about 50 years. My dad was off working as an electrician and my mom worked at Canter's in the bakery all day. I’m basically an accident. Even though I have two brothers and a sister, there’s part of me that’s like an only child. The first five years, I was part of this big family, and then after [my siblings] graduated high school I found myself alone. I think that was also part of why I spent so much time with art. In my earlier years, I had so much exposure to pop culture and teenagers, and then I found myself lacking that kind of stimulation. I think I found it in a pad of drawing paper.

Did you always want to be an artist?
I never studied art formally. I was actually a communications studies major at UCLA. I went to elementary school at 3rd Street here in LA, right next door to the old Art Center. Even though I’m a champion of the school now, as a child, I never even ventured inside. I would see these guys sitting under trees drawing cars, and all the art looked very airbrushed and slick, which is pretty much the opposite of how I perceived art. So I made the decision that art schools can’t teach you your style. I felt it was somehow important to go to a liberal arts university.

How did you develop your style then?
What I really try to capture is the beauty of the bittersweetness of life. That played a big role. When I tried to be perfect, nothing looked right. When I accepted my own vulnerability and frailty and awkwardness, that was when my style started really developing, probably in my mid 20s. When I went from trying to hard—well, I always try too hard. You end up killing the thing you love.

How did you segue from commercial art into fine art?
I moved to New York when I was 26, and I lived there for 10 years. I worked for every single publication, from the New York Times, to Time magazine, to Rolling Stone, to Entertainment Weekly, to little computer magazines, to The Nation, to you name it. I got 12 to 20 assignments every month for over 10 years. I was an art machine. I loved visual problem solving. But it did feel limited. I wanted to venture into other areas. Art to me is really important as collaboration. That’s when I started going into TV and had my series Teacher’s Pet. Or I do my vinyl toys. I collaborate with sculptors to help bring my vision across.

How did growing up as the child of Holocaust survivors affect you—or did it?
On the surface, I didn’t think so. They kind of took the burden of their past away from their children so they could concentrate on their lives. Both my mother and father’s towns were completely mass murdered in the war. I knew my grandparents were both dead. I knew my father was a freedom fighter, but I didn’t know any real details. But I also lived with this feeling that I needed to accomplish something in life—that somehow what they went through wasn’t necessarily in vain.

Do you see any of these themes playing out in your art?
The Skirball started asking me what my art has to do with my heritage, and my first answer was nothing. But the more I started looking at it, the more it started playing a very big role. My little ChouChous and Venison both take place in the woods. And I started realizing the only reason my mom and dad were able to escape was because of the woods. There’s deep forest wrapped around these little shtetls. If it weren’t for the woods protecting people who were escaping—if it was open field, they would have been caught and killed.

What’s the deal with Toby the cat? This guy shows up in your art all the time. He even travels the world like that gnome in Amelie
Toby has always been my alter ego. When I was drawing characters I would always draw myself as a cat. Growing up with Mickey Mouse and Felix the Cat and Saturday morning cartoons, that was a way to really create my own icon, but then I became an adult and used this icon in a much more adult way. I had a soul patch for many years, so he had a soul patch. The name Toby is actually based on a girl I was in love with as a child. Her parents were also Holocaust survivors and were best friends with my parents. Toby was the keeper of your secrets, and he was your best friend, and he loved you unconditionally.

So Toby is just this sweet childish icon?
A lot of the paintings had to do with gifting Toby. I used little girls as a sense of innocence. Toby had many girlfriends, but I gave them all the name Marilyn. Marilyn is actually the name of my very first girlfriend who I dated for four years at UCLA. Her parents were survivors also. If you look at the notion of Toby being gifted, you’re giving someone your… secrets. You’re passing a sense of your intimate self to another. A little kid can look at it and say it’s a funny cartoon. If you’re an adult, you can interpret that in a different way. But a child doesn’t need to -- and they shouldn’t -- until they grow up.

Do you consider yourself a Pop Surrealist?
I’ve always hated that term. A lot of my friends, like Mark Ryden, the Clayton Brothers, and Eric White, all came from commercial art and they may have tried to coin the term Pop Surrealism or Lowbrow. I love Surrealism. But real Surrealism had a different notion of what the human condition was all about. And Pop art came about in a different era of celebrating Pop culture and deconstructing it. So just taking those two and putting them together didn’t describe it. It made it trivial. For me, the strength of the art was our ability to maneuver different mediums. That’s why I wanted the term “pervasive”—or just “everywhere” art.

What is pervasive art, exactly?
It’s a term that works well within all this new media that’s being opened up. Everything has just expanded exponentially. For artists not to want to use every means to be able to express themselves would be silly. For me, trying to create boundaries of what is fine art and what is commercial art—by medium—is ridiculous. The value of this work is by the actual content itself, and the artist.

Do you ever get frustrated by how the internet has increased the accessibility of art?
Everyone can be an artist. If someone said to me, I wish I could be a fine artist, I could sit there and go, well, you don’t have the guts to be a fine artist. I’m talking more about the pedestrian or conventional view of a fine artist. No, being a fine artist—you’re creating a statement, you’re creating a point of view, you’re creating a body of work. And you’ve got to put it together and bring it out to the world. It’s not like, oh, should I cut my nails today, or do I want to paint? It doesn’t work that way. It’s not easy to create a point of view and have a message.

A lot of your exhibits have a common theme or set of characters. What is your starting point? How do you begin that process?
It’s what I do every day. It’s breathing, drawing in a sketchbook. From that I’ll start letting my intuition flow and just draw and not know what I’m putting down; then I discover meaning through that. From that, I start developing a theme or an understanding of what I want to talk about. Putting that theme together is when I start producing a body of work. I don’t necessarily think I’m creating some character or icon, but usually this one creature comes out that represents the exhibition. But it’s never done on purpose.


Warhol’s Mao Works Censored in China





Mao Zedong’s face has long graced trinkets and kitsch sold at tourist markets across China. But in the country’s top art museums, his most famous portrayal by a Westerner isn’t welcome.
Sorry, Andy Warhol.


Although the scion of Pop Art passed away in 1987, Warhol is still generating controversy. A vast traveling retrospective of his work, “Andy Warhol: 15 Minutes Eternal,” has already made stops in Singapore and Hong Kong as part of a two-year Asia tour, but when it moves to mainland China next month, the artist’s Mao paintings won’t be coming along.
Organized by the Andy Warhol Museum in Pittsburgh, the full exhibition consists of hundreds of Warhol’s best-known artworks, including eight silkscreen paintings of Mao. The museum declined to state where the Mao paintings would be kept while the show is on display in Shanghai and Beijing, its two China stops.
“We had hoped to include our Mao paintings in the exhibition to show Warhol’s keen interest in Chinese culture,” said Andy Warhol Museum director Eric Shiner in a statement. He added, “We understand that certain imagery is still not able to be shown in China and we respect our host institutions’ decisions.”
The museum’s staff declined to confirm the exhibition’s dates and venues for Shanghai and Beijing. Its website currently says “check back for details” on the show for both cities.
Nonetheless, over the weekend Shanghai’s Power Station of Art, China’s first state-owned gallery dedicated to contemporary art, posted on its website that it would host “15 Minutes Eternal” from April 29 to July 28 with free entry. The Shanghai institution did not reply to requests for comment.
In an op-ed last month, the English-language edition of the state-owned Global Times tabloid said that Warhol’s Mao paintings pushed the boundaries of cultural acceptability. According to the author, color painted or splotched on Mao’s face could appear like cosmetics — a disrespectful treatment of the Chairman’s face.
Art and controversy are common bedfellows in China. Pop Art was a major influence for China’s contemporary artists in the 1980s and ’90s, among them Ai Weiwei, whose persistent documentation of everyday life once earned him the nickname “the Chinese Andy Warhol.” The artist’s detention by Chinese authorities in April 2011 prevented him from visiting the Warhol Museum one month later.
In the Hong Kong edition of “15 Minutes Eternal,” on view through April 1, the public appeared to respond well to the Mao paintings, which were displayed with a Mao print from the museum’s permanent collection.

Bullet holes stud Viktor Mitic’s pop art




Toronto-based artist Viktor Mitic thinks we need to have a serious conversation about gun violence in our culture. And he’s trying to provoke it by creating art — with a gun.
At his solo exhibition scheduled to open April 4 in Toronto, he’ll show a series of pop art pictures he's created — of figures such as John Kennedy, John Lennon, Benazir Bhutto and Marilyn Monroe — each of them outlined with bullet holes.
Mitic learned to shoot during compulsory military service in the former Yugoslavia in the 1970s.
He studied at the University of Toronto and now leads a tranquil life with his Japanese-Canadian wife and young son, until it comes time to finish off his art.
Each image gets a fresh coat of paint — in vibrant colours — before Mitic sets it up in a shooting range and fills it with bullet holes.
"It just worked out well because the effect that I was getting on canvas was not only the bullet points, the black powder being embedded into the surface of the canvas, it was also something that would make me think a bit more about ..you know...the issues," he said.
He’s been criticized for glamorizing gun culture, but his aim is actually to draw attention to it. Mitic says he’s horrified by incidents such as the recent school shooting in Newtown, Conn., and the shootings at a Danzig Street barbecue in Toronto last summer.
His upcoming show, titled Bullet Proof, places the issue of guns in front of viewers who often have visceral reactions to the bullet holes in the canvas.
Mitic’s images are often of famous people, but also of scenes – one from the War of 1812, another a likeness to Guernica, Picasso’s seminal painting about the bombing of that Spanish city.
He has done paintings of both Stephen Harper and former prime minister Jean Chrétien — though not with the bullet-hole theme —and his work has been collected by the National Gallery of Canada and Beaverbrook Art Gallery in Fredericton. He also has had attention from around the world for his bullet-ridden art.
Bullet Proof by Viktor Mitic will show at The Peach Gallery in Toronto from April 4 to May 2, 2013.

Art review: Crocker's 'Approaching Infinity' comes full circle




Abstraction was a staple of art in the 20th century until it was rudely displaced by Pop Art in the 1960s. While abstraction took a secondary role for a time, it is once again popular with artists in the 21st century.



"Approaching Infinity: The Richard Green Collection of Meticulous Abstraction" at the Crocker Art Museum explores works of intricate complexity that deal with both microcosmic and macrocosmic abstract imagery.
Beginning with forerunners such as Mark Tobey, Yayoi Kusama, John Cage and Bruce Conner, the show traces the development of abstraction based on repetition and, in the case of Cage, chance operations.
One of the first works on view is a small, ethereal, atmospheric tempera on Japanese paper by Tobey, done in 1969, that exemplifies his "white writing," a kind of spiritual automatic writing that adds up to a transcendent abstraction. At the terminus of the exhibition is an intricately worked 2007 gouache drawing by Susanne Schossig, who is an inheritor of Tobey's style. Thus the exhibition seems to come full circle from its progenitors to those who have been influenced by them.
Along the way are works that exhibition curator Diana Daniels points out are seldom seen in Sacramento except in the pages of Art in America magazine. She was stunned to find such a collection in the hands of Green, who lives in Gold River.
Green writes in the exhibition catalog that at the turn of the millennium, he went from being a casual collector to one focused on "the boundless patterns and complexities of the physical world." His interests became metaphysical as well, focusing on the spiritual as well as the physical.
"What unites Richard Green's collection," said Daniels, "is his desire for dialogue between knowing and feeling the enormity of all existence. He has pointedly turned to artists who imagine and demonstrate for us the beauty of line, form and shape in their art as a means to expand and validate developments in a half-century of thought on our place in nature."
The exhibition Daniels has put together is quiet and cool in tone, with many works consisting of minute, repetitive markings that have subtle shifts in color. If you are one of those who think abstraction is easy, you should look at these works.
Some, like James Siena's "Non-Slice Variation" relate to recent scientific discoveries. His ethereal blue markings resemble fractals that create an image reminiscent of decoratively marbled paper.
The race to the moon informs Josaku Maeda's watercolor "Human, space" which turns the moon into an eyeball covered with spacewalk boots. Kusama, who has recently had exhibitions at the Centre Pompidou in Paris, the Tate Modern in London and the Whitney in New York, offers a witty work titled "Fishes Listening to the Sound of Polka Dots," which, Daniels writes, questions "the meaning of self in relation to a vast and complex universe."
Ross Bleckner gets down to the cellular level in "Study for In Replication," an oil painting that looks inside the body at what might be intestines.
Stephen Antonakos covers vellum with dense, incised marks of graphite to make an intense field of black broken by red circles that suggest planets. Barbara Takenaga's "Blue Wheel (M-1)," an acrylic on panel, is a mandalalike representation of outer space, delicately linear and richly colored.
While most of the works in the show are unrelentingly abstract, Ed Loftus gives us an untitled graphite drawing on paper that looks like a photograph. In it a skeleton walks in a landscape with mountains and a lake, reminding one of the 18th century anatomist Albinus' illustrations of skeletons wandering in pastoral landscapes. It's so refined that you need a magnifying glass to see the abstract markings that make up the illusion.
Magnifying glasses, which the museum provides, are helpful in examining many of the works in the show. Green has also lent a decommissioned camera lens from a U2 spy plane through which one can see a fish-eye view of the show.

Dead famous




Celebrities stripped back to the bone as pop artist recreates stars including Michael Jackson, Marilyn Monroe and Amy Winehouse as ghoulish skulls
  • George Ioannou became famous in the 1990s when he launched a collection depicting iconic movie scenes
  • His work now sells for up to £30,000 and clients include Adele and Roman Abramovich
  • This new series of 13 paintings depict the skulls of internationally known celebrities from the past and present
  • 'I am fascinated by how the legacy of the true icons continues to grow long after the real person has gone,' he says

George Ioannou, the British pop-artist famous for his iconic ‘Gangster Art’ is back with a new series of paintings which strip iconic celebrity culture to the bone – literally.
Ioannou first came to fame in the late 1990s when he launched a collection of ground breaking paintings depicting iconic scenes from cult movies.
















His interpretations of the Al Pacino character, Tony Montana in the 1983 film Scarface created a style which made Ioannou one of the UK’s most collectable modern artists.
The Croydon-born artist's work now sells for around £30,000 for an original and his clients include singer Adele, oligarch Roman Abramovich and Dragon’s Den star Theo Paphitis.
George Ioannou, the British pop-artist famous for his iconic 'Gangster Art' exhibition is back with a new series of paintings, including Michael Jackson and Marilyn Monroe, which strip iconic celebrity culture to the bone
Ioannou first came to fame in the late 1990s when he launched a collection of ground breaking paintings depicting iconic scenes from cult movies. His latest work recreates famous people like Amy Winehouse and Freddie Mercury as ghoulish skulls
Other striking images of popular icons through the ages such as Marilyn Monroe, Steve McQueen and Jimi Hendrix were followed by more movie images – Michael Caine in Get Carter and The Italian Job, John Travolta and Uma Thurman in Pulp Fiction and Jack Nicholson in The Shining.
Now, Ioannou has unveiled a new celebrity inspired collection entitled ‘Dead Famous’.
The series of thirteen paintings depict the skulls of internationally known celebrities from the past and present.
Audrey Hepburn. David Bowie, Marilyn Monroe and Bob Marley are among the stars given the spooky pop art treatment.
Their bones are laid bare with only small details added which make their true identities unmistakable.
His interpretations of the Al Pacino character, Tony Montana in the 1983 film Scarface created a style which made Ioannou one of the UK's most collectable modern artists, actress Audrey Hepburn and musician Bob Marley have been given the Ioannou treatment for this new collection
Ioannou's work has become sought after by investors and original prints can sell for up to £30,000. Images of Jimi Hendrix and Elvis as skulls are expected to be among the most popular in his Dead Famous work
‘I think the power of these paintings is how they give so little away yet the small details that remain tell a full story – hopefully part of the story behind the mask of celebrity,’says the 38-year-old artist.
‘What makes a person recognisable when they are stripped to the bone? Who made dreadlocks famous? Who made bleach blonde hair or drop earrings iconic? And who made a bow in their hair notorious?’ says Ioannou.
’I am fascinated by the influence celebrities have on our lives and how the legacy of the true icons continues to grow long after the real person has gone,' he says.
’The flesh grows old but style lasts for ever.
His client list includes Oscar winner Adele, oligarch Roman Abramovich and Dragon's Den star Theo Paphitis, but who will snap up the latest canvas's featuring late Nirvana star Kurt Cobain and singer David Bowie
The series of thirteen paintings depicts celebrities, including Sid Vicious and Madonna, with their bones laid bare and only small details added which make their true identities unmistakable
Ioannou adds: 'People are visual by nature and iconic status is often defined by how celebrities stand out from the pack in order to make a difference.
'But, which is most important – a manufactured look or natural talent?
Ioannou also runs an art collective from his coffee shop in Coulsdon, Surrey.
‘I think the power of these paintings is how they give so little away yet the small details that remain tell a full story – hopefully part of the story behind the mask of celebrity,’ says the 38-year-old artist, who included singer Jim Morrison in the collection

A British artist who contributed to the 20th century Pop Art movement




By Jhupu Adhikari Mar 24 2013
Tags: Leisure Writing
A recent group exhibition that featured works of artists from Britain was covered in one of my earlier columns. Among the names that I had mentioned, was David Hockney whose work I have admired ever since I had the opportunity of seeing his solo exhibition at the Annely Juda Gallery in London in the 1990s. The exhibition featured over 20 portraits and an equal number of still life studies of vases and flowers.

David Hockney, born on July 9 in Bradford in England, is considered ‘one of the most influential British artists of the 20th century’. During his training at the Royal College of Art in London, Hockney featured in an exhibition titled ‘Young Contemporaries’ and along with Peter Blake, the exhibition was hailed as the ‘arrival of British Pop Art.’ While Hockney was certainly a contributor to the ‘Pop Art’ movement, his earlier paintings show clear traces of expressionism. When the Royal Academy refused to let him graduate in 1962, Hockney drew a sketch titled ‘The Diploma’, as a form of protest. The story goes that Hockney refused to write an essay required for the final examination, insisting that his assessment should only be on art. By this time, Hockney had quite a fan following and the Academy finally had to change its regulations and award a diploma.

With such a reputation, it is but to be expected that Hockney would choose to live life in his own way. On a visit to California, where he later chose to settle for long periods, he was inspired to do a series of paintings of swimming pools in the 1960s, using acrylic, a comparatively new medium in those days. In 1961, Hockney explored the nature of gay love in ‘We Two Boys Together Clinging’, after a poem by Walt Whitman and in 1963, painted ‘Domestic Scene, Los Angeles’ showing two men -- one showering while the other washes his back.

Hockney is said to have been born with ‘Synesthesia’ -- whereby he can see colours while listening to music. This made him a highly suitable person for creating backdrops and décor for ballets and operas at La Scala and the New York Metropolitan Opera. The colours that he sees through ‘musical stimuli’ are a base for his construction of the stage sets for ballets and operas where the colours and lighting are created while listening to the music of the piece he is working on.

Hockney returned more frequently to Yorkshire in the 1990s, usually every three months to visit his mother who died in 1999. He then decided to capture the local sights based on boyhood memories. But by 2005, he was painting the countryside first in water colours and later in oils. He created paintings made of multiple smaller canvases placed together -- a style that is often used by artists of today. In June 2007, Hockney’s largest painting titled ‘Bigger Trees Near Warter’ measuring 15 feet by 40 feet, was hung in the Royal Academy’s largest gallery during its annual summer exhibition.

Since 2009, Hockney has painted hundreds of portraits, still lifes and landscapes on iPhone and iPad. His show Fresh Flowers featuring more than 100 of his drawings was held in 2010 at La Fondation Pierre Bergé in Paris, followed in 2011 by another at the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto.

Hockney, whose first one-man show was in 1963 when he was 26 years old, has had many retrospectives devoted to his work. In 1970, the first of several major retrospectives, which opened in London, travelled to three European institutions. In October 2006, the National Portrait Gallery in London organised one of the largest ever displays of his work, from over five decades. In 2009, “David Hockney: Just Nature” was held at the Kunsthalle Würth in Germany. From January 21, 2012 to April 9, 2012, the Royal Academy presented ‘A Bigger Picture’, which included more than 150 works, many of which covered entire walls. Dedicated to images of Yorkshire, along with oils, there were 50 drawings on iPad printed on paper. The exhibition moved on to the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, Spain and later to the Ludwik Museum in Cologne, Germany where it closed on February 3 this year.

In 2008, David Hockney decided to donate ‘Bigger Trees Near Warter’ to the Tate Gallery in London and was quoted as having said, “I thought if I’m going to give something to the Tate I want to give them something really good.”

Victorine Contemporary Art


Marc Harrold
Artexpo New York
                  Please join us at Booth 269 from today until March 24
Visit artexpony.com for more information.

Brigit Nihan
Victorine Contemporary
192 Thames Street
Newport RI 02840
401.848.2544
401.835.1920