Art review: Crocker's 'Approaching Infinity' comes full circle




Abstraction was a staple of art in the 20th century until it was rudely displaced by Pop Art in the 1960s. While abstraction took a secondary role for a time, it is once again popular with artists in the 21st century.



"Approaching Infinity: The Richard Green Collection of Meticulous Abstraction" at the Crocker Art Museum explores works of intricate complexity that deal with both microcosmic and macrocosmic abstract imagery.
Beginning with forerunners such as Mark Tobey, Yayoi Kusama, John Cage and Bruce Conner, the show traces the development of abstraction based on repetition and, in the case of Cage, chance operations.
One of the first works on view is a small, ethereal, atmospheric tempera on Japanese paper by Tobey, done in 1969, that exemplifies his "white writing," a kind of spiritual automatic writing that adds up to a transcendent abstraction. At the terminus of the exhibition is an intricately worked 2007 gouache drawing by Susanne Schossig, who is an inheritor of Tobey's style. Thus the exhibition seems to come full circle from its progenitors to those who have been influenced by them.
Along the way are works that exhibition curator Diana Daniels points out are seldom seen in Sacramento except in the pages of Art in America magazine. She was stunned to find such a collection in the hands of Green, who lives in Gold River.
Green writes in the exhibition catalog that at the turn of the millennium, he went from being a casual collector to one focused on "the boundless patterns and complexities of the physical world." His interests became metaphysical as well, focusing on the spiritual as well as the physical.
"What unites Richard Green's collection," said Daniels, "is his desire for dialogue between knowing and feeling the enormity of all existence. He has pointedly turned to artists who imagine and demonstrate for us the beauty of line, form and shape in their art as a means to expand and validate developments in a half-century of thought on our place in nature."
The exhibition Daniels has put together is quiet and cool in tone, with many works consisting of minute, repetitive markings that have subtle shifts in color. If you are one of those who think abstraction is easy, you should look at these works.
Some, like James Siena's "Non-Slice Variation" relate to recent scientific discoveries. His ethereal blue markings resemble fractals that create an image reminiscent of decoratively marbled paper.
The race to the moon informs Josaku Maeda's watercolor "Human, space" which turns the moon into an eyeball covered with spacewalk boots. Kusama, who has recently had exhibitions at the Centre Pompidou in Paris, the Tate Modern in London and the Whitney in New York, offers a witty work titled "Fishes Listening to the Sound of Polka Dots," which, Daniels writes, questions "the meaning of self in relation to a vast and complex universe."
Ross Bleckner gets down to the cellular level in "Study for In Replication," an oil painting that looks inside the body at what might be intestines.
Stephen Antonakos covers vellum with dense, incised marks of graphite to make an intense field of black broken by red circles that suggest planets. Barbara Takenaga's "Blue Wheel (M-1)," an acrylic on panel, is a mandalalike representation of outer space, delicately linear and richly colored.
While most of the works in the show are unrelentingly abstract, Ed Loftus gives us an untitled graphite drawing on paper that looks like a photograph. In it a skeleton walks in a landscape with mountains and a lake, reminding one of the 18th century anatomist Albinus' illustrations of skeletons wandering in pastoral landscapes. It's so refined that you need a magnifying glass to see the abstract markings that make up the illusion.
Magnifying glasses, which the museum provides, are helpful in examining many of the works in the show. Green has also lent a decommissioned camera lens from a U2 spy plane through which one can see a fish-eye view of the show.

Dead famous




Celebrities stripped back to the bone as pop artist recreates stars including Michael Jackson, Marilyn Monroe and Amy Winehouse as ghoulish skulls
  • George Ioannou became famous in the 1990s when he launched a collection depicting iconic movie scenes
  • His work now sells for up to £30,000 and clients include Adele and Roman Abramovich
  • This new series of 13 paintings depict the skulls of internationally known celebrities from the past and present
  • 'I am fascinated by how the legacy of the true icons continues to grow long after the real person has gone,' he says

George Ioannou, the British pop-artist famous for his iconic ‘Gangster Art’ is back with a new series of paintings which strip iconic celebrity culture to the bone – literally.
Ioannou first came to fame in the late 1990s when he launched a collection of ground breaking paintings depicting iconic scenes from cult movies.
















His interpretations of the Al Pacino character, Tony Montana in the 1983 film Scarface created a style which made Ioannou one of the UK’s most collectable modern artists.
The Croydon-born artist's work now sells for around £30,000 for an original and his clients include singer Adele, oligarch Roman Abramovich and Dragon’s Den star Theo Paphitis.
George Ioannou, the British pop-artist famous for his iconic 'Gangster Art' exhibition is back with a new series of paintings, including Michael Jackson and Marilyn Monroe, which strip iconic celebrity culture to the bone
Ioannou first came to fame in the late 1990s when he launched a collection of ground breaking paintings depicting iconic scenes from cult movies. His latest work recreates famous people like Amy Winehouse and Freddie Mercury as ghoulish skulls
Other striking images of popular icons through the ages such as Marilyn Monroe, Steve McQueen and Jimi Hendrix were followed by more movie images – Michael Caine in Get Carter and The Italian Job, John Travolta and Uma Thurman in Pulp Fiction and Jack Nicholson in The Shining.
Now, Ioannou has unveiled a new celebrity inspired collection entitled ‘Dead Famous’.
The series of thirteen paintings depict the skulls of internationally known celebrities from the past and present.
Audrey Hepburn. David Bowie, Marilyn Monroe and Bob Marley are among the stars given the spooky pop art treatment.
Their bones are laid bare with only small details added which make their true identities unmistakable.
His interpretations of the Al Pacino character, Tony Montana in the 1983 film Scarface created a style which made Ioannou one of the UK's most collectable modern artists, actress Audrey Hepburn and musician Bob Marley have been given the Ioannou treatment for this new collection
Ioannou's work has become sought after by investors and original prints can sell for up to £30,000. Images of Jimi Hendrix and Elvis as skulls are expected to be among the most popular in his Dead Famous work
‘I think the power of these paintings is how they give so little away yet the small details that remain tell a full story – hopefully part of the story behind the mask of celebrity,’says the 38-year-old artist.
‘What makes a person recognisable when they are stripped to the bone? Who made dreadlocks famous? Who made bleach blonde hair or drop earrings iconic? And who made a bow in their hair notorious?’ says Ioannou.
’I am fascinated by the influence celebrities have on our lives and how the legacy of the true icons continues to grow long after the real person has gone,' he says.
’The flesh grows old but style lasts for ever.
His client list includes Oscar winner Adele, oligarch Roman Abramovich and Dragon's Den star Theo Paphitis, but who will snap up the latest canvas's featuring late Nirvana star Kurt Cobain and singer David Bowie
The series of thirteen paintings depicts celebrities, including Sid Vicious and Madonna, with their bones laid bare and only small details added which make their true identities unmistakable
Ioannou adds: 'People are visual by nature and iconic status is often defined by how celebrities stand out from the pack in order to make a difference.
'But, which is most important – a manufactured look or natural talent?
Ioannou also runs an art collective from his coffee shop in Coulsdon, Surrey.
‘I think the power of these paintings is how they give so little away yet the small details that remain tell a full story – hopefully part of the story behind the mask of celebrity,’ says the 38-year-old artist, who included singer Jim Morrison in the collection

A British artist who contributed to the 20th century Pop Art movement




By Jhupu Adhikari Mar 24 2013
Tags: Leisure Writing
A recent group exhibition that featured works of artists from Britain was covered in one of my earlier columns. Among the names that I had mentioned, was David Hockney whose work I have admired ever since I had the opportunity of seeing his solo exhibition at the Annely Juda Gallery in London in the 1990s. The exhibition featured over 20 portraits and an equal number of still life studies of vases and flowers.

David Hockney, born on July 9 in Bradford in England, is considered ‘one of the most influential British artists of the 20th century’. During his training at the Royal College of Art in London, Hockney featured in an exhibition titled ‘Young Contemporaries’ and along with Peter Blake, the exhibition was hailed as the ‘arrival of British Pop Art.’ While Hockney was certainly a contributor to the ‘Pop Art’ movement, his earlier paintings show clear traces of expressionism. When the Royal Academy refused to let him graduate in 1962, Hockney drew a sketch titled ‘The Diploma’, as a form of protest. The story goes that Hockney refused to write an essay required for the final examination, insisting that his assessment should only be on art. By this time, Hockney had quite a fan following and the Academy finally had to change its regulations and award a diploma.

With such a reputation, it is but to be expected that Hockney would choose to live life in his own way. On a visit to California, where he later chose to settle for long periods, he was inspired to do a series of paintings of swimming pools in the 1960s, using acrylic, a comparatively new medium in those days. In 1961, Hockney explored the nature of gay love in ‘We Two Boys Together Clinging’, after a poem by Walt Whitman and in 1963, painted ‘Domestic Scene, Los Angeles’ showing two men -- one showering while the other washes his back.

Hockney is said to have been born with ‘Synesthesia’ -- whereby he can see colours while listening to music. This made him a highly suitable person for creating backdrops and décor for ballets and operas at La Scala and the New York Metropolitan Opera. The colours that he sees through ‘musical stimuli’ are a base for his construction of the stage sets for ballets and operas where the colours and lighting are created while listening to the music of the piece he is working on.

Hockney returned more frequently to Yorkshire in the 1990s, usually every three months to visit his mother who died in 1999. He then decided to capture the local sights based on boyhood memories. But by 2005, he was painting the countryside first in water colours and later in oils. He created paintings made of multiple smaller canvases placed together -- a style that is often used by artists of today. In June 2007, Hockney’s largest painting titled ‘Bigger Trees Near Warter’ measuring 15 feet by 40 feet, was hung in the Royal Academy’s largest gallery during its annual summer exhibition.

Since 2009, Hockney has painted hundreds of portraits, still lifes and landscapes on iPhone and iPad. His show Fresh Flowers featuring more than 100 of his drawings was held in 2010 at La Fondation Pierre Bergé in Paris, followed in 2011 by another at the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto.

Hockney, whose first one-man show was in 1963 when he was 26 years old, has had many retrospectives devoted to his work. In 1970, the first of several major retrospectives, which opened in London, travelled to three European institutions. In October 2006, the National Portrait Gallery in London organised one of the largest ever displays of his work, from over five decades. In 2009, “David Hockney: Just Nature” was held at the Kunsthalle Würth in Germany. From January 21, 2012 to April 9, 2012, the Royal Academy presented ‘A Bigger Picture’, which included more than 150 works, many of which covered entire walls. Dedicated to images of Yorkshire, along with oils, there were 50 drawings on iPad printed on paper. The exhibition moved on to the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, Spain and later to the Ludwik Museum in Cologne, Germany where it closed on February 3 this year.

In 2008, David Hockney decided to donate ‘Bigger Trees Near Warter’ to the Tate Gallery in London and was quoted as having said, “I thought if I’m going to give something to the Tate I want to give them something really good.”

Victorine Contemporary Art


Marc Harrold
Artexpo New York
                  Please join us at Booth 269 from today until March 24
Visit artexpony.com for more information.

Brigit Nihan
Victorine Contemporary
192 Thames Street
Newport RI 02840
401.848.2544
401.835.1920






Victorine Contemporary Art in Newport



Marc Harrold
Artexpo New York

Please join us at Booth 269 from today until March 24 
Visit artexpony.com for more information.

Brigit Nihan
Victorine Contemporary
192 Thames Street
Newport RI 02840
401.848.2544
401.835.1920


Marc Harrold
Artexpo New York


Please join us at Booth 269 from today until March 24
Visit artexpony.com for more information.

Brigit Nihan
Victorine Contemporary
192 Thames Street
Newport RI 02840
401.848.2544
401.835.1920


Exhibit featuring '80s pop art by Keith Haring goes on as authentication battle rages



MIAMI — A showdown over art - real and possibly not so real- is playing out in the MiamiDesign District, completewith legal threats, court orders and lots of confusion.
At issue: whether piecesin an exhibit featuring theworks of 1980s pop-artistKeith Haring have been properly authenticated.
A New York law firm representing the Keith HaringFoundation is demandingthat the exhibit remove allbut 10 of the 175 pieces of art.
The deadline was 7 p.m.Friday.
As the deadline loomed,the entire exhibit appearedto remain intact.
On Friday evening, theshow went on as planned.
Organizers took $25 admission from art lovers whowandered in from the street.
No one was moving artworkout of the exhibit space asthe deadline passed.
Michael Rosen, who co-produced the exhibit withManny Hernandez, said thetwo had come to an agreement with the Haring Foundation in which one of the 12collections in the exhibitwould be removed and therest would be allowed to remain. Rosen said the collection at issue had been removed earlier Friday.
But there is some question on the size of the unauthenticated collection. Rosen said it was a small part ofthe exhibit, while the collection's attorney, StephenWeingrad, said the collection could encompass 100pieces of work.
Rosen's attorney, HermanRussomanno III, sent ane-mail to the Miami Heraldindicating that the exhibitwould continue to show only the 10 pieces of art thatwere authenticated by theHaring Foundation.
"If there's anything leftthere other than those 10pieces, we're going to have aproblem," said Sarah Gold, aFlorida attorney who is filing a lawsuit on behalf of theKeith Haring Foundation.
"Haring Miami," whichopened Wednesday andruns through Sunday at theMoore Building on Northeast 40th Street and SecondAvenue, celebrates the lifeand art of Keith Haring,whose brightly coloredpaintings of featureless people became the international logo of Best Buddies, anorganization that helps thedisabled. Haring died ofAIDS-related complications in 1990.
The Keith Haring Foundation became aware of the"Haring Miami" exhibit inJanuary, when Rosen andHernandez began advertising, said Michael Stout, anattorney representing theNew York foundation.Stout's legal partner, EricJohnson, said he asked Rosen for information aboutwhere each of the 200 piecescame from and documentation of their authenticity.
The information Rosen sentback wasn't satisfactory,Johnson said.
"It would be impossible tomount and exhibit 200 ormore works without involving the foundation," Stoutsaid on Friday. "It becameapparent that there wassomething wrong here."
Rosen insists that everything in the show is authentic.
He said that because theHaring Foundation no longer has a committee that authenticates pieces of art - only attorneys who go aftercopyright infringements -the approximately 165 unauthenticated pieces of art inthe exhibit aren't necessarily fake. They simply mightnot have been examined andauthenticated by the foundation yet.
For example, furnitureand installation art like theimages Haring drew directlyonto light posts in the 1980saren't usually authenticated."You'll never find anypiece of Keith Haring-painted T-shirt or clothing that has a foundation authentication letter," Rosen said.
To get around that idea,he posted a disclaimer at theentrance: "The art in this exhibition may be by the artistKeith Haring or from his circle of friends. . . . the ownersand publisher of this catalogand curator cannot and doesnot guarantee the authenticity of the works."
However, the exhibit hadbeen extensively advertisedas featuring the work ofKeith Haring.
In addition to removingall but the 10 authenticatedpieces of Keith Haring artwork, the court order callson Rosen and his company,Colorful Thumb, to stop distribution of and destroy allcatalogs and brochures associated with the exhibit. Rosen said the items wereno longer being distributed.


Pop